Correction: Low depression literacy exacerbates the development and progression of depressive mood in Chinese adult social media users during COVID-19: a 3-month observational online questionnaire-based study with multiple cross-sectional analyses

Résumé fourni par la source

A correction refers to a change to their article that the author wishes to publish after publication. The publication of this article is subject to Frontiers' editorial approval.Instructions:• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used.The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated. Corrected version: "Did you experience any personal events during the survey period that led to a significantly acute deterioration in your mood?" The original version of this article has been updated.Reason to change: The original wording referred to "September 2021 to September 2022," which covered a period of strict COVID-19 control measures and recurrent outbreaks in China. However, this wording could be misunderstood as referring to the survey administration period. To improve clarity and align the questionnaire item with the study-period description, the wording has been corrected. This correction does not affect the final sample size, analyses, results, or conclusions.[In the published article, there was a reporting error in the sex distribution of the final analytic sample in the Methods section (originally displayed as: 261 women and 192 men). The correct sex distribution was 251 women and 237 men, as reported in the Results section and Table 2. This correction does not affect the final sample size, statistical analyses, results, or conclusions of the article]. A correction has been made to the section [Materials and methods, subsection 2.2. Questionnaire contents, Paragraph 3]:Corrected version: "[Eventually, a valid sample of 488 participants was analyzed collectively (251 women and 237 men; mean age = 32.62 years, SD = 6.71 years; age range: 18-49 years). The effective response rate was 81.3%.]" The original version of this article has been updated.Reason to change: During a recent review of the published article for related follow-up work, we identified a reporting error in the sex distribution of the final analytic sample. The correct distribution is 251 women and 237 men, consistent with the Results section and Table 2. This correction does not affect the final sample size, analyses, results, or conclusions.for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.