Emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum PX1 polymorphisms associated with decreased susceptibility to antimalarials in Uganda
Résumé fourni par la source
Artemisinin-based combination therapies are the cornerstone of malaria treatment and control. In Africa, artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used first-line artemisinin-based combination therapy, but its efficacy in Uganda is increasingly threatened by the emergence of artemisinin partial resistance and reduced lumefantrine susceptibility. To identify loci contributing to this decreased susceptibility, here we assessed signatures of selection in 157 whole-genome sequences of Plasmodium falciparum from Uganda. Although extended haplotypes were observed around Kelch13 C469Y and A675V mutations, the strongest signal of recent selection was centered on a segment of chr. 7 encoding the phosphoinositide-binding protein (PX1, PF3D7_0720700). A haplotype, represented by three PX1 mutations (L1222P, M1701I and D1705N) and two deletions (designated PIN), was first seen in 2008 and rapidly increased, reaching a prevalence >50% in northern Uganda by 2016 and eastern Uganda by 2023. PIN-carrying parasites showed significantly decreased ex vivo susceptibilities to lumefantrine, mefloquine and dihydroartemisinin, an active metabolite of artemether. A parasite strain in which px1 was disrupted in vitro showed increased susceptibility to the three drugs. Thus, PX1 polymorphisms appear to impact on the susceptibilities of African malaria parasites to key drugs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum PX1 polymorphisms associated with decreased susceptibility to antimalarials in Uganda
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.