Association between precentral gyrus morphology and modality-specific intentional communication in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes )
Rattachement africain : fr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The precentral gyrus (preCG) is morphologically defined posteriorly by the central sulcus (CS) and anteriorly by the superior and inferior precentral sulci (preCS). Stimulation of the preCG along the dorsal-ventral plane elicits motor activation across the body in a topographic manner. In this study, we used postimage analyses to characterize the shape of the CS and preCS in a sample of 278 magnetic resonance image scans of chimpanzees. Using these data, we initially described the six most prominent preCG shapes variants, their asymmetries, and heritability. We also tested for their association with selective use of attention-getting communicative behaviors produced in the vocal and manual modalities. Associations were observed between preCG variants and vocal, but not manual, communication. Vocal communication was significantly associated with the inferior preCG shape in the left hemisphere. In contrast, no association was found in CS variants. We also found modest heritability in three of the preCG shape patterns but no significant genetic correlation with vocal intentional communication. Our results suggest that better selective use of a vocal attention-getting sound used for intentional communication is associated with a unique morphological landmark within the inferior preCG.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Association between precentral gyrus morphology and modality-specific intentional communication in chimpanzees ( <i>Pan troglodytes</i> )
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2026
- Éditeur
- National Academy of Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.