Online Monitoring and Performance Degradation Evaluation Method for Automotive-Grade RF Power Amplifiers Under Endurance Aging
Résumé fourni par la source
To meet AEC-Q102 reliability standards for automotive RF power amplifiers (PAs), traditional offline aging tests suffer from discontinuous data, inability to distinguish reversible thermal drift from permanent device damage, and oversimplified evaluation metrics. This paper proposes a complete endurance assessment system for automotive PAs. We build a multi-stress coupled online monitoring platform to continuously collect multi-dimensional performance parameters. A normalized Comprehensive Performance Degradation Index (CPDI) integrating failure physics and time-series features is proposed to quantify device degradation. A hybrid FP-LSTM prediction model constrained by failure physics is put forward to address weak generalization and low precision of conventional algorithms. A four-level hierarchical evaluation framework complying with AEC-Q102 and ISO 26262 is also formulated. Experiments on 24 GaAs/GaN PAs under 1000 h composite aging verify that the platform’s maximum measurement error is below 2.08% and can detect early hidden degradation. CPDI achieves 98.6% accuracy in identifying irreversible damage. The FP-LSTM model reduces lifespan prediction mean relative error to only 3.17%, boosting accuracy by 47.52% versus the classic Arrhenius model. The proposed system can be deployed on production lines to provide standardized quantitative support for automotive RF PA endurance certification.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Online Monitoring and Performance Degradation Evaluation Method for Automotive-Grade RF Power Amplifiers Under Endurance Aging
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Paradigm Academic Press Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.