Dynamic Modeling and Self-Tuning Fuzzy Skyhook Control of a Metro Vehicle with a Flexible Carbody and Semi-Active Suspension

Le résumé fourni par la source

Lightweight metro carbodies may exhibit elastic modes within ride-comfort-relevant frequency bands, limiting semi-active suspension controllers tuned offline for nominal conditions. This study proposes a skyhook-based parameter self-tuning fuzzy control (PSTFC) strategy for lateral secondary suspension. Its rule base and membership functions remain fixed, whereas two input quantization factors and one output scaling factor are updated online from the carbody lateral velocity and carbody–bogie relative lateral velocity, enabling state-dependent adaptation without increasing fuzzy-inference complexity. A rigid–flexible coupled multibody model is developed using Craig–Bampton component-mode synthesis and validated against field vibration measurements from a Type-A metro lead car. The controller is evaluated using ADAMS/Rail–MATLAB co-simulation, with robustness examined through repeated stochastic simulations and variations in vehicle speed, passenger load, track-irregularity intensity, and suspension parameters. The flexible model reproduces the measured location-dependent spectral characteristics more accurately than the rigid-carbody model. Under nominal conditions, PSTFC reduces the rear-carbody lateral-acceleration RMS from 0.1341 to 0.1015 m/s2 and the Sperling ride comfort index from 1.5485 to 1.2864, corresponding to improvements of 24.3% and 16.9% over passive suspension. Relative to fixed-parameter fuzzy skyhook control, the two indicators are further reduced by 5.8% and 4.7%, respectively. The improvement persists across the investigated off-nominal conditions without controller retuning. These results demonstrate that state-dependent parameter scaling improves the adaptability of fuzzy skyhook control while retaining a compact inference structure, providing a computationally tractable approach to flexible-carbody vibration suppression.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.