Local nutrient hotspots shape red deer habitat selection in a nutrient-poor landscape

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Nutrient availability in many temperate ecosystems is shaped by soil properties and historical land use. Especially in otherwise nutrient-poor landscapes human-induced, local fertilisation can generate fine-scale mosaics of nutrient hotspots. Whether and how large herbivores respond to such heterogeneity remains poorly understood. We tested whether spatial variation in soil-derived nutrient availability structures habitat selection by large herbivores, using full-year GPS tracking data from 7 red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) in the Veluwe, the Netherlands. We used soil types as a proxy for nutrient availability and assigned nutrient scores based on soil pH, cation exchange capacity and soil structure. We then evaluated habitat selection across multiple components of space use: (i) home range size; (ii) use of relatively nutrient-rich parts within home ranges; (iii) selection among soil types; and (iv) selection of locally enriched former agricultural patches. Red deer used relatively nutrient-rich within their home range more than expected based on availability, including local patches enriched by former agricultural use. However, site selection did not consistently follow nutrient scores among soil types. These results show that nutrient availability does shape habitat selection, but primarily through fine-scale, localised nutrient enrichment rather than broad-scale variation in soil properties. Our findings demonstrate that nutrient-related foraging contributes to habitat selection in a large wild herbivore, while also revealing that this process is scale- and context-dependent. By repeatedly concentrating their foraging in nutrient-rich patches, large herbivores may contribute to nutrient redistribution across the landscape, with the potential to reinforce or modify existing spatial heterogeneity in resource availability and ecosystem functioning.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.