Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

There are other worlds than these: why sensory and consumer science should embrace Bayesian inference

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : se, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Sensory and consumer science aims to understand, describe, and predict people's experiences (sensory, emotional, hedonic , etc.) of stimuli or products through measurement and analysis of their reactions thereto. How well these analyses address our research questions is, however, rarely interrogated. We instead routinely rely on the traditional practice and associated inferential guidelines of frequentist null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) and p -values. Here we propose a renewed discussion on how data analysis is handled within sensory and consumer science. Specifically, we posit that Bayesian inference is a valuable addition to our statistical toolbox. While NHST evaluates statistical hypotheses by asking “how likely are the data given the hypothesized (null) value?”, the Bayesian statistical framework flips this to “what is the relative compatibility of different values given the data and our pre-existing beliefs?” thereby directly addressing the questions we are often seeking answers to. In this article we: discuss common concerns with NHST, contrast the underpinnings of NHST and Bayesian inference, describe how Bayesian inference is conducted, directly compare the results of previously published data analysed using both approaches, and exemplify using Bayesian inference for two common cases in sensory and consumer science (determining discriminability and intensity equivalence). We also address common practical and analytical concerns with Bayesian statistics. Deeper appreciation for how statistical and scientific inference are related as well as increased awareness of and competence in different statistical approaches would enrich our research. Given the advantages the approach offers, this effort should include increased use of Bayesian inference.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
There are other worlds than these: why sensory and consumer science should embrace Bayesian inference
Date Crossref
01/01/2027
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsMultisensory perception and integrationBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.