Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Taxonomic assessment of the glyptosternoid catfish Parachiloglanis hodgarti (Hora, 1923) based on morphometric analysis of type specimens and riverine populations in Nepal

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : np. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This study addresses a major gap in knowledge regarding intraspecific morphological variation in Parachiloglanis hodgarti (Hora, 1923) (Sisoridae) by conducting comparative morphometric analyses of populations from Nepal's principal river drainages (Gandaki, Koshi and Karnali), the topotypic population from Pharping, and the holotype to evaluate the taxonomic implications of this variation. Eighteen size-corrected morphometric traits were analysed in 108 specimens collected from Pharping (n = 24), Gandaki (n = 28), Koshi (n = 28) and Karnali (n = 28). Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) revealed pronounced population structuring, with the Karnali population showing the strongest multivariate differentiation. Variation among populations was primarily associated with body proportions, head morphology and fin morphology. Univariate analyses detected significant differences in individual morphometric traits among populations, with Pharping showing the highest number of significantly differentiated traits and Gandaki the fewest. Comparisons with the holotype revealed morphometric differences across all populations. Although the Karnali population differed from the holotype in the greatest number of traits (11), it differed from the Pharping topotypic population in only three traits. Because the Pharping topotypic population represents the closest extant proxy for the holotype and closely resembles it in overall morphometric characteristics, the greater divergence between Karnali and the holotype is likely attributable to preservation-related deformation, historical and contemporary differences in measurement protocols, or both, rather than genuine taxonomic differentiation. Collectively, these findings demonstrate geographically structured morphological variation while supporting continuous intraspecific differentiation rather than discrete taxonomic separation. The morphological differentiation observed in the Karnali population may reflect localised evolutionary divergence associated with geographic isolation and environmental heterogeneity, although confirmation will require integrative molecular and ecological investigations. This study establishes a population-level morphometric framework for P. hodgarti in Nepal and provides a baseline for future taxonomic, evolutionary and ecological research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Taxonomic assessment of the glyptosternoid catfish <i>Parachiloglanis hodgarti</i> (Hora, 1923) based on morphometric analysis of type specimens and riverine populations in Nepal
Date Crossref
16/08/2026
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Tribhuvan University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Tribhuvan University.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorMorphological variations and asymmetryFish Biology and Ecology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.