Free-Style Perforator Flaps for Acute Reconstruction of Large Soft-Tissue Defects in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Résumé fourni par la source
Aim: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of freestyle perforator flaps in the acute setting and to analyze predictors of postoperative complications.Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged 18 years and older who presented to the emergency department of a university hospital between February 1, 2023, and November 30, 2023, with acute traumatic injuries or non-healing wounds. Patients who were identified during initial emergency department evaluation and management as having extensive soft tissue defects and subsequently underwent reconstruction using a freestyle perforator flap were included in the analysis.Results: The study included 20 patients who underwent reconstruction with freestyle perforator flaps. No statistically significant associations were found between age, sex, etiology, or flap size and complication occurrence. There was no significant difference in complication rates between single-perforator and double-perforator flaps. Complications were most common after nasal reconstruction. All cases requiring secondary skin grafting for donor-site closure occurred in patients who underwent lower extremity reconstruction.Conclusion: Freestyle perforator flaps may be considered a fast, versatile, and reliable option for the acute management of large soft-tissue defects requiring emergency reconstruction across different anatomical regions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Free-Style Perforator Flaps for Acute Reconstruction of Large Soft-Tissue Defects in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
- Date Crossref
- 16/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Acta Medica Alanya
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.