From Injury to Inclusion
Rattachement africain : ch, ca, my, us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To map the scope, thematic focus, and contribution of publications based on the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey (InSCI), and to identify remaining knowledge gaps in the literature. DESIGN: We conducted a structured evidence map of peer-reviewed publications derived from InSCI. InSCI is a cross-sectional survey of adults with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). Wave 1 (2017 to 2019) included 12,591 participants across 22 countries; wave 2 (2022 to 2024) included 15,249 participants across 32 countries. Publications were tracked and classified into 7 IPSCI-based domains. RESULTS: By April 2026, InSCI generated 117 peer-reviewed publications (including 11 from wave 2). Health care needs were the largest category, followed by epidemiological studies, enabling environments, and education/employment. InSCI-based publications reported cross-country differences in quality of life, health care access, unmet needs, environmental barriers, and employment. Publications also reported a high burden of secondary health conditions, variation in health service use, and lower employment rates among persons with SCI/D compared with the general population. CONCLUSIONS: InSCI offers an expanding international data set on the lived experiences of individuals with SCI/D. Although publication activity is high across several IPSCI domains, critical research gaps remain regarding equity, gender, education, younger populations, and general population comparisons.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- From Injury to Inclusion
- Date Crossref
- 20/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.