What do laboratories know about the pneumatic tube delivery systems they depend on?
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Highlights• Survey of laboratories on pneumatic tube system governance • Half of the respondents were unsure how often their pneumatic tube systems were serviced • Total of 63% didn't know if the systems were validated before installation • Laboratories may not realise whether their systems are functioning correctly Abstract Introduction: Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) are a key component of many laboratory sample delivery systems.However, they can be a source of preanalytical error, particularly when samples are lost or damaged.The Key Incident Monitoring and Management (KIMMS) program of the Royal College of Pathologists Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) conducted a survey to gather information on the maintenance of these systems. Materials and methods:The categories of questions included general information, service, maintenance and validation of systems, and incident reporting.The responses were compiled and reviewed using Microsoft Forms.Results: The survey found a lack of awareness of servicing and validation records, as well as of the PTS's functionality.Most sites reported incidents with their pneumatic tube systems (37/45, 80%), mainly system failures rather than samples being lost, delayed, or damaged.Conclusions: Greater oversight of laboratories is needed, and relationships with system vendors must be strengthened to ensure quality service.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- What do laboratories know about the pneumatic tube delivery systems they depend on?
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.