Lipid-Rich Urothelial Carcinoma
Résumé fourni par la source
Lipid-rich urothelial carcinoma (LR-UC) is a rare subtype, with ∼65 cases reported in the literature. Here, we report the largest case series of bladder LR-UC, including 40 patients. Clinical follow-up was available for 29 patients. Twenty-seven patients had at least 2-years follow-up, 15 of whom were alive (55.6%) at 2 years. Twenty-six patients had at least 5-years follow-up, 12 of whom were alive (46%) at 5 years. Definitive resection was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (P=0.0188). Neoadjuvant treatment showed a trend towards improved OS compared with resection alone. Patients with a higher percentage of LR-UC (>10%) showed a trend of decreased OS. Positive MDM2 immunostain in both LR-UC and adjacent UC was observed in 6 of 8 tumors, with MDM2 gene amplification confirmed by FISH in one case and MDM2 RNA-ISH overexpression in one additional case. RNA-seq was performed on 9 paired microdissected LR-UC and adjacent UC samples. Principal component analysis demonstrated LR-UC clustered with its paired UC more than with the LR component of other patients. PRSS3P2 was the only component detected to be higher in LR-UC than in UC. GSEA analysis demonstrated that 59.1% of positively enriched genes were metabolism-related, and 57.6% of negatively enriched genes were immune/inflammation-related. In summary, we report the largest LR-UC series to date, highlighting its aggressive clinical behavior, and suggesting a possible benefit of definitive surgical resection and neoadjuvant therapy. MDM2 expression in UC with lipoblast-like cells may pose a diagnostic pitfall and transcriptomic profiling confirm the UC origin lipoblast-like cells.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lipid-Rich Urothelial Carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 14/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.