Eight-year evolution of quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy: A prospective cohort study
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) yields strong short- and mid-term outcomes, but long-term quality-of-life (QoL) trends remain less defined. Our objectives were to assess 8-year changes in weight, obesity-related medical problems (ORMPs) and QoL after LSG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort included 106 adults who underwent LSG (2016-2017). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1, 5 and 8 years using anthropometric data, ORMPs' status and the Moorehead-Ardelt II QoL questionnaire. Fifty-four patients completed 8-year follow-up. Linear mixed-effects and non-parametric tests were used for paired comparisons. RESULTS: The mean percentage of excess weight loss declined from 73.2% at 1 year to 63.4% at 8 years, with excellent weight loss outcomes decreasing from 92.6% to 81.5% and failure rates rising to 16.7%. QoL improved from - 0.44 preoperatively to 1.80 at 1 year, peaked at 1.99 at 5 years and then declined to 1.41 at 8 years. Weight loss independently predicted higher QoL (β = +0.019 per kg lost, P < 0.001). Most ORMPs remained improved long term, while gastroesophageal reflux disease and smoking increased. CONCLUSIONS: LSG provides durable long-term benefits; however, attenuation after 5 years and rising behavioural and reflux-related risks highlight the importance of structured, multidisciplinary, lifelong follow-up to preserve outcomes and QoL.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Eight-year evolution of quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy: A prospective cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 13/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.