Assessing the Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Advancing Digital Transformation by Nigeria's Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC)

Résumé fourni par la source

This study examines the impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on digital transformation in Nigeria's Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC). It highlights how ICT integration has changed basic education delivery through policy frameworks, infrastructure, teacher capacity building, and learning outcomes. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research evaluates UBEC's digital initiatives such as the establishment of smart schools, e-learning platforms, teacher training programs, and ICT resource centers across Nigeria's 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. Key findings indicate significant progress in bridging the digital divide, with over 37 model smart schools established across the nation and with about 21 fully functioning, and over a thousand trainned teachers on digital pedagogies across the country. The UBEC Digital Resource Centre has become crucial for delivering digital content, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, challenges persist, including inadequate infrastructure, uneven implementation across states, digital literacy gaps among educators, and disparities in access between urban and rural areas. Connectivity issues and unreliable electricity further limit the effectiveness of ICT efforts. The article concludes that while UBEC's ICT initiatives lay a foundation for inclusive basic education, continuous investment, coherent policies, and strong stakeholder collaboration are necessary for sustaining progress and ensuring equitable access. Recommendations include improving broadband connectivity to rural schools, enhancing ongoing teacher professional development, fostering public-private partnerships, and implementing comprehensive monitoring and evaluation frameworks to guide progress and evidence-based decision-making.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.