Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Factors Associated with Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality through early detection. However, lung cancer screening uptake among high-risk groups remains low and varies by setting. This study aims to assess the factors associated with LDCT screening uptake among high-risk individuals. Methods We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus for observational studies and randomized controlled trials of high-risk individuals published up to May 31, 2026. Random-effects models estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for LDCT uptake among high-risk individuals, with subgroup, sensitivity, publication bias, and risk of bias assessments. Results Of 9117 publications, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled overall LDCT uptake was 39.5% (95% CI: 33.2%–46.1%), with higher uptake in the UK (91.3%) than China (39.8%) and the US (33.2%). Screening uptake was lower among current smokers (OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.97), those living in rural areas (OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.96), and the least affluent (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.98), while it was higher among those with health insurance group (OR=2.96, 95% CI: 2.35–3.74), those with COPD (OR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.42–2.41), and those with a family history of lung cancer (OR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.48–1.88). Sensitivity analyses indicated robustness, with an overall low-to-moderate risk of bias. Conclusion Smoking, living in rural areas, and deprivation were associated with lower uptake, while health insurance, COPD, and family history of lung cancer were associated with higher uptake. High study heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation. Lung cancer screening campaigns should target smokers, rural residents, and less affluent individuals to reduce disparities. Future research should include low- and middle-income countries.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Factors Associated with Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
13/08/2026
Éditeur
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningRadiation Dose and Imaging

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.