Saccadic paradigms in restless legs syndrome with and without augmentation: An eye-tracking study.
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether saccadic eye movement paradigms can be used to detect impulsivity and executive dysfunction in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS), particularly in those experiencing augmentation due to long-term dopaminergic therapy. METHOD: Forty-seven nondemented RLS patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients without augmentation or symptoms of impulse control disorders (RLS controls) were compared with 28 patients with augmentation (RLS + AUG) and 20 matched healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent an eye-tracking battery including prosaccade, antisaccade, and stop signal paradigms. Error rates and reaction times were compared between groups. Correlation analyses were performed to evaluate associations between saccadic performances between the different paradigms. RESULTS: = .030). Correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong positive associations between error rates of prosaccade, antisaccade, and stop signal tasks. CONCLUSIONS: RLS + AUG exhibit deficits in oculomotor response inhibition, possibly indicating executive dysfunction and increased impulsivity likely related to long-term dopaminergic therapy. These preliminary results highlight the potential utility of eye tracking in clinical monitoring of dopaminergic therapy in RLS. Future longitudinal eye-tracking studies in a larger cohort are necessary to evaluate temporal dynamics of dopaminergic exposure, augmentation, and impulse control disorder symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Saccadic paradigms in restless legs syndrome with and without augmentation: An eye-tracking study.
- Date Crossref
- 13/08/2026
- Éditeur
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.