Prodromal Parkinson's Disease in Essential Tremor: the TITAN study
Rattachement africain : it, us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The relationship between essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD) remains controversial. Beyond viewing ET as a discrete risk factor for PD, recent frameworks propose that an ET phenotype may represent a clinical presentation of prodromal PD (pPD), consistent with the current reconceptualization of ET as a syndrome. Whether co-occurring subtle motor signs alter pPD probability in ET remains unknown. Methods: Using the MDS research criteria, we calculated pPD probability in a large cohort of ET patients with and without subtle motor signs (rest tremor, hypomimia, isolated rigidity, reduced arm swing, altered repetitive movements, global slowing). Multivariable regression was used to identify independent predictors of pPD probability. Results: Among 599 ET patients (median disease duration: 12 years), only 6 (1.0%) met criteria for probable pPD. Although ET patients with subtle motor signs exhibited higher continuous pPD probability scores than those without, the frequency of possible or probable pPD did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariable regression, neither ET nor individual subtle motor signs, but hypomimia, were independent predictors of pPD probability, which was primarily driven by older age and male sex. Conclusions: Long-standing ET, whether isolated or accompanied by subtle motor signs, is not associated with pPD, with the possible exception of co-occurring hypomimia.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prodromal Parkinson's Disease in Essential Tremor: the TITAN study
- Date Crossref
- 13/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.