Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Doula Support During Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Postpartum

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence on doula support in pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library (which includes clinical trials), CINAHL, PsycInfo. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) based in the United States that evaluated doula support compared with standard care. Included studies reported maternal, infant, and partner outcomes from database inception through November 18, 2025. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twelve RCTs and 18 NRSIs reported on doula support compared with standard maternity care. One study had low risk of bias (ROB) (one RCT), 10 had moderate ROB (three RCTs, seven NRSIs), and 19 had high ROB (eight RCTs, 11 NRSIs). Doula support is likely to be associated with lower rates of preterm birth and cesarean delivery, improved birth experiences, and increased likelihood of postpartum visit attendance (moderate certainty of evidence). Doula support may be associated with improved prenatal mood, spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, initiation of breastfeeding, childbirth education attendance, respectful care, satisfaction with care, self-efficacy, parenting confidence, postpartum adjustment to parenthood, and reduced epidural anesthesia use, length of labor, and infant mortality (low certainty of evidence). It may not be associated with reduced rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal readmissions, and neonatal intensive care admissions (low certainty of evidence). Among studies composed entirely of people at risk of disparities (specifically, those arising from race, carceral settings, low income, and having public insurance), four of five reported at least some benefit associated with doula support. There was insufficient information available on the effects of varying intensity or types of doula support. Heterogeneity was noted across many outcomes. CONCLUSION: Research suggests that doula support is associated with some improved maternal outcomes, although many studies were heterogeneous and rated as having high ROB. Research on type (including independent doulas), intensity, and timing of doula support could help to clarify settings in which doula care improves maternal and child outcomes and reduces health disparities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P795C

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Doula Support During Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Postpartum
Date Crossref
13/08/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisPelvic floor disorders treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.