Interpersonal Synchronization of Brain and Body Tracks Attention and Listening Engagement

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Purpose Speech perception is a fundamental part of everyday communication that relies on more than simple identification of words and sentences. Attention and listening engagement both contribute to speech perception, while representing distinct aspects of the listening experience. Attention is typically associated with cognitive focus, whereas listening engagement additionally involves cognitive and affective immersion in sound. Despite their importance, these states remain difficult to disentangle, behaviorally and physiologically. Both have been linked to interpersonal synchronization (the synchronization of biobehavioral signals across individuals), raising questions about what this synchronization actually reflects. Method In this study, we disentangled attention and listening engagement by independently manipulating both factors within a single experiment. Thirty participants listened to two simultaneously presented streams of meaningful speech and were instructed to focus on only one. Both attended and unattended stimuli were designed to be either engaging or non-engaging. Neural activity was recorded using EEG, while physiological responses were measured using heart rate and electrodermal activity. Results Interpersonal synchronization was computed from neural and bodily signals, alongside a self- report measure of listening engagement and auditory attention decoding (AAD), a neural measure of selective attention. Interpersonal synchronization of all three modalities significantly predicted listening engagement, whereas neural interpersonal synchronization was the only measure that significantly predicted attention. These findings suggest that attention is primarily driven by cognitive processes represented in the brain, while listening engagement additionally involves affective processes that are more strongly reflected in bodily responses. Conclusions Overall, this study demonstrates that different forms of interpersonal synchronization reflect distinct dimensions of the listening experience and supports interpersonal synchronization as a potential objective marker of listening engagement.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.