Lichen sclerosus. Part 2. Guideline of the DGG, DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 013-105, July 2025
Rattachement africain : ch, de, ee, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Objective The aim of the German-language S3 guideline on lichen sclerosus (LS) is to provide an evidence- and consensus-based foundation for the diagnosis and management of this disease. This publication presents a concise summary of the relevant content focusing on genital LS in girls and women. This second part addresses the treatment of LS. The separately published first part covers the definition of the disease, its diagnosis, and the management of LS during pregnancy. Methods The German-language, evidence- and consensus-based S3 guideline on LS was developed under the leadership of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Dermatological Society (DDG), based on the European “EuroGuiDerm Guideline on Lichen Sclerosus.” The interdisciplinary guideline panel comprised 24 experts from 16 professional societies and actively involved patient representatives in the development process. Recommendations Ultrapotent or potent topical glucocorticoids in combination with emollients remain the standard therapy. Due to the frequently chronic-relapsing course of the disease, continuous, long-term follow-up of patients is essential. Topical calcineurin inhibitors may be used as second-line therapy. Monotherapy with topical hormonal preparations is not recommended for the treatment of LS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lichen sclerosus. Part 2. Guideline of the DGG, DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 013-105, July 2025
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.