Peer Review Report For: Involving adult inpatients, family, partners and/or carers in measuring and monitoring patient safety in acute care hospitals: Protocol for an umbrella review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Rattachement africain : ie, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Internationally, there is a growing emphasis on the importance and value of the patient’s “voice”, and the unique insights patients and their families have into healthcare system functioning. However, despite international policy shifts toward empowering patients to support patient safety, there remains a lack of knowledge regarding the full range of existing approaches for facilitating patient involvement in measuring and monitoring patient safety (MMS) in the hospital. This umbrella review will aim to identify existing approaches to involving adult inpatients (or family/partners/carers communicating on their behalf ) in MMS in hospital settings, along with evidence supporting their use. Methods The current review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for umbrella reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) checklist. Systematic searches will be conducted across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Academic Search Complete) to identify existing reviews that consider patient-involvement in MMS in hospital settings. Data will be extracted on the characteristics of approaches identified (e.g., surveys, interviews, incident reporting) any evidence of their feasibility, contextual appropriateness and psychometric properties, along with any reported barriers or facilitators relating to their implementation. Methodological quality will be appraised using the CASP checklist, and certainty of evidence will be assessed via a hybrid GRADE and GRADE-CERQual approach. Conclusions This umbrella review will deliver a comprehensive profile of each different approach to involving patients, families and carers in MMS in hospital settings. By evaluating the psychometric evidence and practical feasibility (APEASE criteria and reported barriers and facilitators to use) of these approaches, the findings will support the ascertainment of best practice to involving patients in MMS in hospital settings, ultimately reflecting the important shift in the historical framing of patients as passive recipients of care to active partners in safe and effective care delivery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Peer Review Report For: Involving adult inpatients, family, partners and/or carers in measuring and monitoring patient safety in acute care hospitals: Protocol for an umbrella review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
- Date Crossref
- 12/08/2026
- Éditeur
- F1000 Research Ltd
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
COPE Galway pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Temple Street Children's University Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Health Service Executive pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
School of Medicine Discipline of General Practice pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Nursing and Midwifery Centre for Health Research Methodology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Children's Health Ireland pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Clinical Director for Quality Improvement pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
School of Business and Economics Discipline of Economics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, COPE Galway et Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science — London School of Economics and Political Science, avec 7 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.