Effectiveness of brodalumab in biologic-experienced adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a focused narrative review
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To summarize recent literature evaluating treatment outcomes in adults with plaque psoriasis who switched to brodalumab from a different biologic because of treatment failure (inadequate initial response/loss of an adequate initial response) and/or adverse events. METHODS: Relevant published evidence from real-world studies and clinical trials that met defined criteria was identified through targeted searches of PubMed, supplemented by manual reviews of reference lists and input from authors. RESULTS: In real-world studies of patients with treatment failure on anti-IL-17 agents (secukinumab and/or ixekizumab), brodalumab achieved PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 in 47.8%-81.7%, 40.0%-58.9%, and 28.0%-50.0% of patients, respectively, after 12-16 weeks of treatment. PASI 100 was achieved by 45.5%-63.6% of patients with 26 weeks of brodalumab therapy after anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23, or anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents in a phase 4 study. Studies with longer-term follow-up have suggested that responses to brodalumab are durable in biologic-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: Literature evaluated in this narrative review positions brodalumab as a rational, safe, and effective treatment option for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who have an inadequate response/loss of an initial response to their existing biologic agent.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effectiveness of brodalumab in biologic-experienced adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a focused narrative review
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.