Higher-winding phases in one-dimensional non-Hermitian topological superconductors
Rattachement africain : tw, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Non-Hermitian topological superconductors provide a setting in which point-gap topology, non-Hermitian skin effects, and Majorana zero modes are strongly intertwined. In this work, we adopt a coefficient-based approach for computing winding numbers and deriving analytical expressions for phase boundaries in one-dimensional non-Hermitian topological superconductors characterized by point-gap topology with Z invariants. We apply this approach to two non-Hermitian topological superconducting lattice models, with and without sublattice degrees of freedom, including longer-range hoppings, thereby accessing a much broader parameter space. These extensions generate higher-order polynomials and support phases with higher winding numbers, reflecting the underlying Z topology. We further clarify how a weak perturbation suppresses the non-Hermitian skin effect while preserving the sublattice-symmetry-protected invariant associated with Majorana zero modes. The predicted winding numbers are verified by open-boundary spectra, where one or multiple pairs of zero-energy boundary modes appear consistently with the bulk invariant. We also examine the stability of these modes against onsite disorder by examining the zero-mode energy, the bulk gap, and the inverse participation ratio. Our results provide a systematic and efficient route to constructing topological phase diagrams for higher-winding non-Hermitian topological superconductors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Higher-winding phases in one-dimensional non-Hermitian topological superconductors
- Date Crossref
- 12/08/2026
- Éditeur
- AIP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.