Ventricular‐vascular coupling at rest and immediately following maximal exercise in adults with and without multiple sclerosis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) may impair ventricular‐vascular coupling (VVC), a measure of the interaction between the cardiac and vascular systems. We evaluated if VVC differed between individuals with and without MS with similar age‐predicted fitness. Individuals with MS ( n = 20) and without (CON, n = 18) underwent VVC measurement before and immediately after a maximal incremental cycle test with peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak) measurement. VVC was quantified as the ratio of arterial elastance (E A : end‐systolic pressure (ESP)/stroke volume) to ventricular elastance (E LV : ESP/end‐systolic volume). ESP was assessed with radial applanation tonometry, and cardiac volumes were obtained from apical four‐chamber echocardiography. Sex, BMI and VO 2 peak were not different between groups. Individuals with MS were older, had higher E A ( p < 0.01) and E LV ( p = 0.02), but VVC did not differ between groups. After adjustment for age, the group differences in E A and E LV remained significant. VVC was similar between individuals with and without MS, before and immediately after maximal exercise. However, individuals with MS had higher E A and E LV , suggesting higher arterial and ventricular loads. Our data suggest that individuals with MS with similar fitness to controls exhibit higher E A and E LV with preserved coupling.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ventricular‐vascular coupling at rest and immediately following maximal exercise in adults with and without multiple sclerosis
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.