Canadian Experience with Acessa ProVu: A Case Series of the First 60 Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Fibroid Ablation Procedures at a Single Centre
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: (s): Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Lap-RFA) is a minimally invasive procedure for reducing fibroid size; however, most published studies primarily focus on fibroids ≤7 cm. We describe the first Canadian case series of ultrasound-guided Lap-RFA for symptomatic fibroids, including treatment of fibroids up to 10 cm. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, an analysis was performed of consecutive ultrasound-guided Lap-RFA cases for the management of symptomatic fibroids from September 15, 2022 to May 13, 2024. The primary outcome was fibroid volume reduction at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of postoperative recovery stay (LOS), urgent care visits, reinterventions and subsequent pregnancies. RESULTS: at 12 months, a difference of 39.7%, 38.9% and 43.6% respectively (P < 0.01). Two patients had postoperative urgent care visits and one underwent reintervention. Three patients (5%) conceived a median of 141 days (IQR 74-268) postoperatively, all delivered at term. CONCLUSION: (s): In this case series, we observed similar volume reductions as in the literature, even for fibroids 7-10 cm in size. Further studies incorporating validated patient-reported outcome measures are needed to better correlate objective outcomes with patient-reported improvement.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Canadian Experience with Acessa ProVu: A Case Series of the First 60 Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Fibroid Ablation Procedures at a Single Centre
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Toronto Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Queen's University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology — University of Toronto, Queen's University et Faculty of Medicine.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.