Risk factors for failure following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty
Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: In the event of early or haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the preferred treatment is debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), with reported cure rates ranging from 60% to 80%. Nevertheless, the performance of this surgical strategy and the factors associated with poorer outcomes remain unknown in the Brazilian population. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DAIR in early PJI following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and identify factors linked to unfavourable clinical outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA between January 2011 and December 2017, developed early PJI, and were treated with DAIR with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. An unfavourable outcome was defined as infection persistence, recrudescence, recurrence, or the need for revision surgery. Results: A total of 83 hips were included in the study, with a DAIR success rate of 72.3%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified pathogen (59.7%), and no pathogen-related factors were associated with outcomes. Patient-related independent risk factors for unfavourable outcome included pre-DAIR haemoglobin ⩽ 10 g/dL (OR [95% CI] = 6.26, 1.63–24.08; p = 0.008) while a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a validated score that quantifies patient comorbidity burden, ⩽1 (OR [95% CI] = 0.04, 0.00–0.32; p = 0.003) and primary osteoarthritis (OR [95% CI] = 0.23, 0.06–0.95; p = 0.042) were protective. A procedure-related factor associated with failure was primary and THA surgical time ⩾180 minutes (OR [95% CI] = 10.15, 2.54–40.56; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this population, prognostic factors associated with DAIR outcomes were related to patient characteristics and features of the index procedure rather than to antibiotic therapy or DAIR itself. These findings may help refine patient selection for DAIR and highlight potentially modifiable factors – such as preoperative anaemia, that could reduce the risk of treatment failure following THA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Risk factors for failure following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Center for Specialized Hip Care pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Rio de Janeiro State University Research Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Sciences (LAPESF) pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Hospital Infection Control Committee pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro et Center for Specialized Hip Care — National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.