Structural evolution of a yeast amyloid in vivo is shaped by chaperones
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Summary Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies of amyloid fibrils have revealed endpoint structures of disease-relevant filaments and polymorphic intermediates formed during in vitro assembly of prion-like proteins. However, how transmissible prion or prion-like amyloids evolve during de novo formation and maturation in living cells remains unknown. Here, using the yeast prion [ PSI + ] as a model, we isolated Sup35NM amyloid fibrils from successive stages of [ PSI + ] maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterised their near-atomic structures and population-level structural diversity by combining cryo-EM and atomic force microscopy. We show that intermediate and mature states differ in predominant fibril structure and the regions of the Sup35 sequence incorporated into the core, and that structural diversity decreases during maturation. Curing of [PSI+] at the mature state by guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl), which selectively inhibits ATPase activity of the chaperone Hsp104, restored both the predominant intermediate amyloid structure and the broader structural diversity characteristic of the intermediate state. In addition, Hsp104, Ssa1 (Hsp70) and Sis1 (Hsp40) associate differently with fibrils from the two states. Together, these findings provide direct structural evidence for amyloid evolution in vivo and support a chaperone-mediated mechanism of conformer selection within a polymorphic amyloid population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Structural evolution of a yeast amyloid <i>in vivo</i> is shaped by chaperones
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.