Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Bridging the Generation Gap in Education: Transitioning from Traditional Pedagogies to AI-Enhanced Teaching and Learning in the Twenty-First Century

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

The rapid advancement of digital technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming educational systems worldwide, redefining how teaching and learning are conceptualized, delivered, and assessed. While technological innovations offer unprecedented opportunities for personalized learning, enhanced engagement, data-driven decision-making, and expanded access to knowledge, they also expose a significant generational divide among educators and learners. This divide is characterized by differing levels of technological proficiency, pedagogical beliefs, digital literacy competencies, and attitudes toward educational innovation. As schools, universities, and training institutions increasingly transition from traditional teacher-centred approaches to technology-assisted and AI-enhanced learning environments, understanding and addressing this generation gap has become a critical educational priority. This paper critically examines the nature, causes, and implications of the generation gap in the context of twenty-first-century educational transformation. Drawing upon contemporary literature on educational technology, digital literacy, generational theory, innovation adoption, and AI in education, the paper explores how educators from different generations navigate the challenges and opportunities associated with emerging technologies. Particular attention is given to the contrasting experiences of digital natives and digital immigrants, the evolving role of teachers in AI-supported learning environments, and the impact of technological change on curriculum design, assessment practices, learner engagement, and educational equity. The paper further investigates how institutional readiness, professional development, infrastructure availability, leadership support, and policy frameworks influence the successful integration of AI-driven educational tools. The analysis argues that the generation gap should not be viewed merely as a technological challenge but as a multidimensional educational issue encompassing cultural, pedagogical, ethical, and socio-economic dimensions. Without deliberate interventions, disparities in digital competence and technological confidence may exacerbate existing educational inequalities and hinder meaningful innovation. However, when supported through collaborative learning cultures, targeted professional development, intergenerational mentoring, and inclusive policy initiatives, the generational divide can become a catalyst for educational renewal and transformation. The paper proposes a framework for bridging generational differences through lifelong learning, digital capacity building, and human-centred AI integration that preserves the relational and ethical foundations of education while embracing technological advancement. The study concludes that the future of education depends not on replacing traditional pedagogical wisdom with artificial intelligence, but on fostering productive partnerships between human expertise and technological innovation. Bridging the generation gap is therefore essential for creating resilient, inclusive, and future-ready education systems capable of preparing learners for the complexities of an increasingly digital and AI-driven world.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Bridging the Generation Gap in Education: Transitioning from Traditional Pedagogies to AI-Enhanced Teaching and Learning in the Twenty-First Century
Date Crossref
11/08/2026
Éditeur
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Educational Leadership and InnovationDigital literacy in educationDigital Education and Society

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.