CONDITION NUMBER-AWARE PRUNING: PRESERVING MATHEMATICAL STABILITY IN SPARSE NEURAL NETWORKS
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The increasing scale of deep neural networks has necessitated model compression techniques, with pruning emerging as a prominent approach to reduce computational and memory costs. However, aggressive pruning introduces a critical challenge: the degradation of mathematical stability and adversarial robustness. Recent research reveals that highly pruned weight matrices tend to become ill-conditioned, exhibiting exploding condition numbers that undermine model performance and robustness . This paper proposes a condition number-aware pruning framework that explicitly preserves mathematical stability during the pruning process. We establish theoretical connections between sparsity, condition number, and local Lipschitz continuity, demonstrating that the condition number becomes the dominant factor limiting robustness in over-sparsified models . Our methodology integrates a differentiable Condition Number Constraint (CNC) with transformed sparse regularization (TSCNC) to simultaneously achieve high sparsity and well-conditioned weight matrices. Experimental evaluations on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that our approach significantly improves both standard accuracy and adversarial robustness compared to conventional pruning methods, achieving superior performance across VGG, ResNet, and WideResNet architectures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CONDITION NUMBER-AWARE PRUNING: PRESERVING MATHEMATICAL STABILITY IN SPARSE NEURAL NETWORKS
- Date Crossref
- 27/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Cerebration Science Publishing Co., Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.