Quantitative Analysis of Multicomponent Converter Gas Using Raman Spectroscopy with Light Intensity Correction
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Accurate and stable online analysis of converter gas composition is essential for calorific value calculation and efficient energy utilization in the steel industry. However, field disturbances such as laser power fluctuations and optical transmission variations can alter Raman scattering intensity and reduce concentration retrieval accuracy. To address this issue, a system-level strategy combining hardware-based light intensity monitoring and data-driven modeling is proposed. Raman spectra are corrected using synchronously monitored scattered-light intensity and processed by wavelet filtering, adaptive baseline correction, and second-derivative transformation. A LightGBM model is subsequently used to quantify H2, CO2, CO, N2, and CH4. The intensity-corrected model achieves coefficients of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9982 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) values ≤ 0.2493 for all components, with the mean RMSE reduced by 57.5% compared with the uncorrected model. In the laser-power disturbance test, the CH4 prediction error decreases to 0.9%. A six-day field test at a steel plant shows good agreement between the Raman-derived calorific values and those measured by the combustion calorimeter, with a residual standard deviation of 103.11 kcal/m3. These results demonstrate that the proposed method is suitable for robust online analysis of complex industrial gases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Quantitative Analysis of Multicomponent Converter Gas Using Raman Spectroscopy with Light Intensity Correction
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2026
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.