Gross, microscopic, and imaging findings of congenital malformations in farmed caimans ( Caiman yacare )
Résumé fourni par la source
) is widely used in commercial farms in the Pantanal region, and studies characterizing CMFs in these animals are scarce. This study describes the pathological and imaging findings of CMFs in farmed caimans. From February 2022 to February 2023, the incubation and maternity of a caiman commercial farm, operating in ranching and farming systems, were monitored. A total of 26 distinct CMFs were identified in 30 farmed caimans. All animals were classified as infantile (9.65 ± 2.69 cm snout-vent length). CMFs were grouped according to anatomical site, with craniofacial disorders (18 cases) being the most frequent findings, followed by spinal malformations (13 cases). Palatoschisis (PC) and cheiloschisis (CL) were reported in 6 yacare caimans, which also exhibited a malformed palatal velum and secondary aspiration pneumonia. Meningoencephalocele was diagnosed in 3 caimans, with brain hemorrhage being a typical secondary lesion in these cases. Anophthalmus, exophthalmos, and cyclopia represented the ocular CMFs. Spinal malformations (kyphosis and scoliosis) were detected in 13 yacare caimans and were thoroughly characterized by the X-ray radiographic analysis. Tail abnormalities were reported in 12 animals, including tail agenesia (1 case) and coiled tail (11 cases). Other sites of CMFs include the limbs, the coelomic wall, and the skin. Radiographic assessments were obtained from all 30 CMFs, providing detailed information on these lesions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Gross, microscopic, and imaging findings of congenital malformations in farmed caimans ( <i>Caiman yacare</i> )
- Date Crossref
- 09/08/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.