Personality Profiles in Bipolar Disorder: Differences Across Diagnostic Subtypes and Associations with Demographic and Health Factors

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Background Personality traits are consistently associated with bipolar disorder (BD). However, their features across BD diagnostic subtypes and their modulation by demographic and health-related factors remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to characterize Big Five personality domains in individuals with BD compared to controls, and to examine differences between BD type I (BD-I) and BD type II (BD-II). Methods We analyzed 833 participants from the MadManic cohort (300 BD subjects and 533 controls) with available Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) data. Linear regression models were used to assess associations between personality traits and BD diagnosis, adjusting for relevant covariates. Additional comparisons were conducted across sex, age, and Body Mass Index (BMI), and between BD-I and BD-II patients. Results BD was associated with higher Negative Emotionality ( NE ) and lower Extraversion and Conscientiousness . Conscientiousness was also inversely associated with BMI. Within the BD group, individuals with BD-I exhibited lower NE compared to those with BD-II. Stratified analyses indicated that elevated NE in BD was the most consistent domain across sex, age, and BMI subgroups, whereas differences in Extraversion and Conscientiousness varied depending on subgroup features. Conclusions BD is characterized by a distinct personality profile marked by elevated NE and reduced Extraversion and Conscientiousness. NE emerged as the most robust domain associated with BD, which may also differentiate between subtypes, with higher levels observed in BD-II than BD-I. These findings highlight the relevance for considering demographic and health-related factors, particularly BMI, when interpreting personality patterns in BD, supporting the role of personality dimensions to examine clinical heterogeneity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.