How Magnetic Field Strength Affects Stellar Coronal Mass Ejection Dynamics

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Observations show that stellar coronal mass ejection (CME) candidates display relatively lower kinetic energies compared to expectations from solar flare–CME relations extrapolated to the stellar regime. This behavior was predicted by studies of magnetic confinement of CMEs by strong large-scale stellar magnetic fields. However, the possible promoting role of stronger small-scale magnetic fields has not yet been properly explored in previous studies. In this work, we present the first parametric study that simultaneously incorporates both the promoting and confining effects of magnetic field strength on CME dynamics. We perform CME simulations with scaled solar magnetograms spanning 〈 B ⋆ 〉 = 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 B ⊙ and inserting flux ropes whose magnetic energy is set to scale as E FR ∝ 〈 B ⋆ 〉 2 . Our results show that CME speed and mass increase with magnetic field strength in this restrictive scenario, approximately following v CME ∝ 〈 B ⋆ 〉 and M CME ∝ 〈 B ⋆ 〉 1.5 . These trends indicate that, within this idealized solar-scaled framework, increasing the magnetic field strength enhances the net promoting forces relative to the confining forces and drives faster, more massive CMEs. We further identify the upward Lorentz force as the dominant contributor to the acceleration and the mass enhancement. We also conducted additional cases with different flux rope energies that do not follow the above scaling assumption and found that stronger flux ropes produce faster and more massive CMEs for each given stellar model. The adopted scaling assumptions are intended as a controlled parametric experiment rather than a realistic model of young solar-type stars, and future work using more realistic stellar magnetic maps will be required to determine which regions of the parameter space explored here are most relevant to active stars.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.