Plasma p-tau217 and NfL predict incident dementia in the community
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract INTRODUCTION Characterizing the prognostic utility of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in predicting longitudinal cognitive trajectories is essential; however, population-based evidence is needed. METHODS We evaluated plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) in 4,971 dementia-free individuals aged 70 years and older from the population-based Norwegian HUNT study. Predefined cut-offs categorized biomarker ranges (p-tau217: low, intermediate, high; NfL: low, high), in addition to continuous biomarker analysis. RESULTS Adjusted for other risk factors, higher baseline p-tau217 and NfL ranges indicated a significantly increased dementia risk after four years compared to low ranges (intermediate p-tau217: risk ratio [RR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.01–1.50; high p-tau217: RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.73–2.44; high NfL: RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.31–2.27; jointly high p-tau217 and NfL: RR 3.32, 95% CI 2.61–4.23). The estimated cumulative risk of all-cause dementia was 10.6% (95% CI 9.3–12.1) for low p-tau217, 16.9% (95% CI 14.6-19.5) for intermediate p-tau217, 33.0% (95% CI 29.9–36.1) for high p-tau217, 15.7% (95% CI 14.4–17.0) for low NfL, 35.4% (95% CI 30.6–40.5) for high NfL, and 47.8% (95% CI 40.7–55.0) for jointly high p-tau217 and NfL. The association of p-tau217 with incident dementia differed by sex. DISCUSSION These findings support the use of blood-based biomarkers for population-level dementia risk stratification, underscore the value of combining markers to improve prognostic precision, and can aid clinicians using plasma p-tau217 or NfL in interpreting dementia risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Plasma p-tau217 and NfL predict incident dementia in the community
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.