Prolonged indolent clinical course in a high-risk chronic phase-CML patient without cytogenetic or molecular response: a case challenging established response paradigms
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) is currently treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and the early achievement of cytogenetic and molecular milestones is strongly associated with improved clinical outcomes. Here, we describe the case of a 55-year-old woman diagnosed with CP-CML in 2002 who received sequential TKI therapy for more than 20 years. Despite continuous treatment, she never achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or a major molecular response (MMR), and the BCR::ABL1 IS transcript levels remained above 10% for most of the disease course. At diagnosis, she presented with high-risk features, including p190 BCR::ABL1 transcript expression, and exhibited multiple mutations, but not driver ones, over time. Nevertheless, along with several TKIs treatments, she maintained a stable chronic-phase disease with sustained hematologic control and preserved a good quality of life throughout long-term follow-up. This case highlights the biological heterogeneity of CML, the timing and trajectory of BCR::ABL1-driven disease, the importance of patient-centered outcomes and the role of TKI therapy in maintaining durable hematologic remission and long-term disease control, even in the absence of optimal molecular milestones.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prolonged indolent clinical course in a high-risk chronic phase-CML patient without cytogenetic or molecular response: a case challenging established response paradigms
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.