Nursing career frameworks to support career progression: A scoping review
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Objective This review aimed to identify, examine, and synthesize current literature on global nursing career frameworks and identify key attributes that effectively support nurses’ career progression. Methods A scoping review guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) best practice guidance for protocol development and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, APA PsycINFO (Ovid), four online databases, grey literature, and professional nursing peak 'bodies' websites. Sources were included if they were reported in English and focused on the nursing profession and career progression, structured career planning, or career pathway frameworks. Data were synthesized using thematic analysis. Results From the 1159 identified, 12 sources were included. Key attributes of nursing career frameworks that support career progression were identified, including self-directed career planning, clear pathways and role definition, strong leadership and collaborative networks, workforce issues, and prioritizing nurse well-being. Conclusion Nursing career frameworks appear to offer strategies that complement workforce recruitment and retention. Such frameworks can provide structured guidance, promote diverse career opportunities, and foster a sustainable nursing workforce.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Nursing career frameworks to support career progression: A scoping review
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.