Estimating the Benefits of the Comprehensive Disease-modifying Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Heart Failure
Rattachement africain : es, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
To determine the effects of the comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological approach among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, a cross-trial, aggregate-data analysis was performed to estimate the expected combined effect of quintuple therapy by multiplying trial-level HRs, assuming independent and multiplicative treatment effects from Phase III randomised clinical trials: EMPHASIS-HF, PARADIGM-HF, pooled DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced, and pooled VICTORIA and VICTOR. The imputed aggregate treatment effects on the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalisation were favourable to the quintuple compared with conventional therapy (HR 0.34; 95% CI [0.27-0.42]). This also occurred for cardiovascular death alone (HR 0.47; 95% CI [0.35-0.63]), first heart failure hospitalisation (HR 0.31; 95% CI [0.23-0.40]) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.51; 95% CI [0.39-0.67]). The numbers needed to treat per year for the primary outcome, cardiovascular death and first heart failure hospitalisation were 10, 23 and 15, respectively. Our findings support the potential benefit of comprehensive therapy, with the incremental role of vericiguat likely greatest in higher-risk patients or those with recent worsening heart failure.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimating the Benefits of the Comprehensive Disease-modifying Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Heart Failure
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Radcliffe Medical Media Ltd
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.