Cognitive determinants and technological adoption: examining behavioral intention mechanisms in Chinese artisanal design practices mediated by AI-generated content
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) is a rapidly evolving technology with significant computational and creative potential, offering new possibilities in design, aesthetics, and process innovation. However, traditional artisans view AIGC as a potential threat to the authenticity and value of their work. Research on artisans’ acceptance of AIGC is limited. This study aims to identify the key factors influencing Chinese artisans’ willingness to adopt AIGC-assisted design and develop a context-specific measurement scale and evaluation model. A mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative research was used, including Craftsman interviews and literature review. Exploratory factor analysis and structural equation model analysis identified six key factors affecting adoption: serendipity for design, artisanal epistemology, performance expectancy, and perceived ease of use. Simulated craft authenticity and epistemic openness did not show direct effects. The study highlights the need for technology integration that respects artisans’ cognitive frameworks and creative traditions, advocating for a shift from technological neutrality to cultural adaptation and collaborative co-creation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cognitive determinants and technological adoption: examining behavioral intention mechanisms in Chinese artisanal design practices mediated by AI-generated content
- Date Crossref
- 08/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.