Association of Lithium Use With Suicide and Self-Harm Among Chinese Adolescents and Adults With Bipolar Disorder
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bipolar disorder (BD) greatly increases the risk of suicide. While lithium is recognized for reducing suicide and suicidal behaviors, evidence regarding its association with suicidal ideation remains limited. This study evaluated lithium's association with reduced suicidal ideation and behaviors among adolescents and adults with BD in China. criteria for BD, recruited between April 19, 2024, and November 30, 2024. Patients receiving lithium for ≥80% of the first 6 months in the preceding year formed the lithium group; those without lithium exposure served as controls. The primary outcome was suicidal ideation assessed by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale; secondary outcomes included suicidal behaviors, nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), and aggression. = .01). Subgroup analyses indicated more pronounced protective associations among females, adults, higher-income individuals, and those without comorbid anxiety, rapid cycling, or predominantly depressive episodes, regardless of psychotic symptoms. Lithium was associated with a 40% lower risk of suicidal ideation and reduced suicidal behaviors in BD. These findings reinforce lithium as a first-line treatment for suicide prevention and highlight its comprehensive antisuicidal role-from lower rates of ideation to fewer behaviors-supporting confident, evidence-based clinical use.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association of Lithium Use With Suicide and Self-Harm Among Chinese Adolescents and Adults With Bipolar Disorder
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.