Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Artificial intelligence and antimicrobial stewardship: From clinical decision support to public health action-On behalf of APUA

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
17Institutions déclarées
10Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance continues to threaten the effectiveness of modern medicine and poses major public health challenges worldwide. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes are essential to mitigate inappropriate antimicrobial use but are often resource-intensive and difficult to sustain. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have generated interest in its potential to support stewardship activities across clinical, operational, and public health domains. OBJECTIVES: To critically review the current and emerging roles of AI in AMS and to examine its opportunities, limitations, and implications for clinical practice, public health, and health systems globally. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on AI applications relevant to AMS, including diagnostic support, antimicrobial prescribing, behavioural and implementation science, infection prevention, surveillance, One Health approaches, drug discovery, and governance. Particular attention was paid to ethical considerations, human oversight, and applicability in low- and middle-income country settings. RESULTS: AI has demonstrated potential to enhance diagnostic precision, support clinical decision-making, optimise antimicrobial use, strengthen surveillance systems, and inform targeted stewardship interventions. However, challenges related to data quality, bias, interpretability, workflow integration, ethical governance, and equity remain significant. AI systems developed in high-income settings may not be directly transferable to low- and middle-income countries without careful adaptation and local validation. CONCLUSIONS: AI should be viewed as a decision-support tool that augments, rather than replaces, AMS expertise. When implemented responsibly within robust governance frameworks and aligned with AMS principles, AI can contribute meaningfully to improved antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance control. Sustained human leadership, equity-focused deployment, and health system strengthening remain essential.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Artificial intelligence and antimicrobial stewardship: From clinical decision support to public health action-On behalf of APUA
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Antibiotic Use and ResistanceBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.