Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Findings From Electronic Medical Record Review of 2500 Patients Identified With Lyme Disease Diagnoses, Test Orders, and Antibiotic Orders in the SubLyme Network

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
11Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Electronic health records provide opportunities for improving Lyme disease surveillance by collecting detailed clinical information and timely, scalable disease incidence estimation. Medical record review can improve understanding of clinical manifestations, how likely and possible cases compare, and potential misclassification of possible cases. Methods: The SubLyme Network is a collaboration among 5 healthcare systems, a coordinating center, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The sites each conducted stratified random sampling of 500 potential acute Lyme disease episodes for medical record review from patients with a diagnosis, test order, and/or appropriate antibiotic in 2022 or 2023. Reviewers abstracted data, including from free text notes, to classify patients as likely or possible Lyme disease and by clinical manifestation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify differences between possible compared to likely Lyme disease cases. Results: Among 2500 reviews, 880 patients were categorized as having likely or possible new onset, active Lyme disease. The patient proportion identified as having a specific clinical manifestation ranged from 61% to 76% across sites. Of likely and possible cases, 55.9%, 7.8%, 1.3%, and 3.1% were diagnosed with erythema migrans, Lyme arthritis, Lyme carditis, and neuroborreliosis, respectively. Possible cases differed from likely cases in having more nonspecific symptoms, non-Lyme disease diagnoses, provider uncertainty, and undocumented provider decision-making. Conclusions: Medical record review is expected to be more accurate than computable phenotypes for Lyme disease identification and staging, yet likely and possible cases were challenging to distinguish, and a sizable proportion could not have clinical manifestation assigned. Findings provide direction for computable phenotype refinement to improve case identification. KEY WORDS: clinical manifestations, electronic health records, epidemiology, Lyme disease, surveillance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Findings From Electronic Medical Record Review of 2500 Patients Identified With Lyme Disease Diagnoses, Test Orders, and Antibiotic Orders in the SubLyme Network
Date Crossref
01/08/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Vector-borne infectious diseasesParasites and Host Interactionsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.