Adaptive operator-generated subspaces for effective many-body Hamiltonians
Rattachement africain : id. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Electronic-structure and embedding workflows terminate in effective many-body Hamiltonians, whereas quantum eigensolver studies often start from hand-built qubit models. We present the Adaptive Clifford-Algebra Subspace Eigensolver (A-CASE), a single-reference, operator-generated Rayleigh--Ritz method. Overlap, Hamiltonian, observable, and response matrices are reconstructed from one shared Pauli-expectation bank, while adaptive growth scores overlap-aware local pencils and rejects symmetry leakage or near-linear dependence. A strict FCIDUMP adapter supplies the active-space boundary. For linear H$_4$ in STO-3G with CAS(4e,4o), the mapped sector agrees with independent determinant FCI to $3.1\times10^{-15}$ Ha. At a nine-vector budget A-CASE has a $3.019$ mHa error; replacing the determinant reference by a two-operator ADAPT-VQE state reduces it to $0.342$ mHa, without implying a matched total-cost advantage. Under a matched contract, the fixed-reference route uses one state preparation versus ADAPT-VQE's ninety but measures roughly an order of magnitude more Pauli words. Exact fixed-angle ADAPT-GCIM gives $13.364$ mHa at the nearest size match and $10.674$ mHa at the iteration match, with its transition-pair burden reported separately. Across a broader benchmark ladder, fixed Krylov bases are generally more accurate and often narrower but substantially less well conditioned. A grouped bootstrap propagates finite-shot variability through thresholding, diagonalization, root matching, spectral weights, susceptibility, and broadening; its bands are explicitly heuristic and conditional, not finite-sample confidence certificates. The work establishes an executable path from an interchange Hamiltonian to energies, correlations, and response, without claiming materials accuracy, favorable scaling, or quantum advantage.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.