Functional restoration of immune defects in STAT1 gain-of-function disease following stem cell gene editing

Résumé fourni par la source

Germline gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gene cause a dominantly inherited inborn error of immunity (IEI) characterized by chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, autoimmunity, severe opportunistic infections and an increased risk of malignancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is curative but is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality in STAT1 GOF patients compared to other IEI. To develop a curative, autologous alternative to HSCT, we evaluated gene editing strategies in STAT1 GOF model cell lines, primary T cells, and patient-derived HSCs. Universal and mutation-specific strategies using CRISPR/Cas-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) were limited by low efficacy (<25%), poor viability, and a lack of allele-specificity. In contrast, adenine base editing corrected the recurrent and highly pathogenic p.T385M mutation with upwards of 90% efficiency in patient T cells and HSCs without significant unintended on- or off-target genomic aberrations. Gene editing functionally restored total STAT1 expression (p<0.0217), STAT1 phosphorylation (p<0.0056), interferon-stimulated gene expression (OAS1; p=0.0005) and improved IL-17 production (p<0.0001). Edited HSCs retained multilineage differentiation capacity and sustained engraftment with persistence of the corrected allele at 16 weeks in humanized immunodeficient mice. These data demonstrate efficient and precise correction of STAT1 GOF mutations by base editing, with maintenance of the correction through long-term engraftment in vivo. This represents the first application of gene editing to correct a dominant gain-of-function mutation causing immunodeficiency, with potential applicability to other genetic disorders associated with heterozygous and gain-of-function mutations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.