Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Development of a perioperative core process and structure indicator set using modified COMET methodology and participatory approaches

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Robust, patient-centred indicators are important to quality of care. This study aimed to develop a core indicator set for structure and process in perioperative care using a participatory, evidence-informed approach. Methods: We conducted a three-phase project based on modified COMET methodology. Indicators of process and structure in perioperative care were identified from a systematic review and mapped to a 10-domain conceptual framework developed in parallel. Stakeholders, including patients, carers, and clinicians, took part in indicator refinement and prioritisation through four rounds of surveys. Quantitative analyses assessed rank stability, attrition bias, and consensus strength, while qualitative comments were thematically analysed. A consensus workshop and consultation were used to finalise the indicator set. Results: From 657 sources in the systematic review, 615 perioperative indicators were identified (324 process, 248 structure, 43 unclear) and were mapped on to the conceptual framework. Four survey ranking rounds involving over 250 stakeholders reduced the number of indicators to 142, showing high stability (ρ = 0.89, W = 0.712) and increasing agreement. A consensus workshop with 26 participants produced a final set of 56 indicators (28 core and 28 desirable) that aimed to balance feasibility, impact, and patient-centredness. Conclusion: This participatory process produced a consensus-based, multidimensional core set of perioperative structure and process indicators reflecting both clinical relevance and lived experience. The indicator set is likely to be valuable in quality-related activities. The methodology used offers a potentially transferable model for developing indicator sets of process and structure.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les sujets associés

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesClinical practice guidelines implementation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.