Effectiveness of Onabotulinumtoxin-A in Patients with Chronic Migraine and Previous CGRP-mAb Treatment Failure: A Multicentre 6-Month Real-World Experience

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with chronic migraine (CM) with previous failures among oral standard-of-care migraine medications do not respond to monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonine gene related peptide pathway (CGRP-mAbs), leaving limited evidence-based options for subsequent preventive strategies. The present multicentre real-world study evaluated the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxin-A (BoNT-A) in CM patients with previous CGRP-mAb failure and multiple prior oral preventive failures. METHODS: This prospective, observational, non-randomized multicentre study enrolled patients with CM who had failed ≥3 classes of oral preventive treatments and ≥1 CGRP-mAb due to lack of efficacy or intolerance. Participants received BoNT-A according to the PREEMPT "follow-the-pain" paradigm every three months and were followed for 6 months. Co-primary outcomes were change in monthly headache days (MHD) after three and six months and ≥50% MHD responder rates at both time points. RESULTS: < 0.001), respectively. The percentages of participants achieving the response status in MMD at the third month and sixth month were 30% and 45%, respectively. In the third and sixth months, 22 patients (41.5%) and 27 patients (50.9%), respectively, converted from chronic to episodic migraine, while the prevalence of medication-overuse headache decreased from 81.1% of patients at baseline to 45.3% and 43.4%, respectively. Migraine-related impact and disability scores improved over follow-up, alongside improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms and in migraine-specific quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support the use of BoNT-A in difficult-to-treat patients with CM following CGRP-mAb failure and provide further evidence that its therapeutic effects may rely on mechanisms that are at least partially distinct from, and potentially complementary to, those of CGRP-targeted therapies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.