Allergens and Toxicity in Rye
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rye ( Secale cereale ) is a cereal commonly employed in different food items. However, it is allergenic and toxic in nature to sensitive people. Rye has gluten proteins, specifically secalins, which induce immune reactions in celiac disease and non-celiac gluten-sensitive individuals. Rye can also accumulate mycotoxins such as ochratoxin A, which are formed through fungal infestation, that give rise to serious health risks. Detection of the rye allergens has in the past been through immunoassays like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which detect known proteins. Newer developments have unveiled methods like Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy accompanied by machine learning algorithms for quick and non-destructive detection of gluten contamination, including from rye. For detecting toxins, techniques such as mass spectrometry and biosensors have been established. An example is graphene-based field-effect transistors, which have proven viable in real-time mycotoxin detection such as ochratoxin in food matrices. In the future, merging new technologies holds potential for enhancing detection and control of allergens and toxins of rye. Portable, easy-to-use biosensors can be developed to conduct on-site testing, ensuring better food safety. In addition, artificial intelligence and machine learning can be used to maximize detection techniques to achieve better and quicker identification of contaminants. Further research and innovation in this area are necessary to reduce health hazards of consuming rye and to guarantee the safety of food items that involve rye.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Allergens and Toxicity in Rye
- Date Crossref
- 03/08/2026
- Éditeur
- CRC Press
- Type
- book-chapter
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.