Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Psychometric Evaluation of Forensic Medicine Multiple-Choice Questions: An Item Analysis From a Nepali Medical College

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : np, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are test items that are essential to assess the competency of medical students in forensic medicine. However, the psychometric quality of these test items in Nepali medical colleges remains largely unexplored. This study evaluated the difficulty index, discrimination index, and distractor effectiveness of forensic medicine MCQs to identify areas requiring improvement. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 30 MCQs from the end-of-semester forensic medicine examination which was administered to 100 third-year medical students. The item difficulty, the discrimination index (via Kelley's 27% method), and performance of the distractor were calculated for each question. Results: The students showed high performance, with a mean score of 23.25±3.61 out of 30. Difficulty analysis showed that majority of the items (60%) fell within an acceptable difficulty range (70-90% correct), while 16.7% were very easy and 6.6% were difficult. Discrimination was good in 43.3% of the items, moderate in 23.3%, and poor in 33.3%. Distractor analysis identified non-functional distractors in a large proportion of items, including nine items (30%) with at least one zero-response option. Overall, 44 of 90 distractors (48.9%) across all items were non-functional. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between item difficulty and discrimination index (ρ = -0.4265, p = 0.019); items of moderate difficulty (50-69% correct) showed the highest mean discrimination, with both moderate- and acceptable-difficulty items outperforming items at the extremes of difficulty. Conclusions: The examination revealed adequate student performance; however, item quality analysis demonstrated the need for improvement, with approximately one-third of the items failing to meet the desired standard and therefore requiring revision due to poor discrimination or non-functional distractors. Structured faculty training in item-writing principles and regular psychometric evaluation may help improve assessment quality in Nepali medical education.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Psychometric Evaluation of Forensic Medicine Multiple-Choice Questions: An Item Analysis From a Nepali Medical College
Date Crossref
01/07/2026
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Lumbini Medical College pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Kathmandu University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Lumbini Medical College, Kathmandu University et Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Medical Education and AdmissionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingStudent Assessment and Feedback

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.