Digital stress, employee performance, and mental well-being: examining the moderated mediation role of social media use
Rattachement africain : in, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction The rapid digitalisation of workplaces has transformed organisational processes, creating new opportunities alongside new demands for employees. Digital stress has emerged as a critical challenge for employees' psychological well-being and job performance, yet empirical evidence on the integrated effects of digital stress and social media use remains limited. Methods Survey data were collected from 386 banking employees and the proposed moderated mediation model was analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Results Digital stress exerted a significant negative effect on both mental well-being and employee performance. Mental well-being positively influenced employee performance and partially mediated the relationship between digital stress and performance. Social media use significantly moderated the mediated pathway, such that purposeful, work-related use strengthened employees' psychological resilience under conditions of digital stress. Discussion The findings extend Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory by conceptualising purposeful and supportive social media use as a job resource for coping with digital stress. Organisations should therefore encourage deliberate, work-related and supportive use of social media while discouraging excessive or non-work-related use
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Digital stress, employee performance, and mental well-being: examining the moderated mediation role of social media use
- Date Crossref
- 31/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.