Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Temporal regimes in heritage and urban planning: Conceptualising the ordering of past, present and future

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This article develops the notion of temporal regimes to analyse how time is ordered, valued and linked in the intertwined fields of heritage and urban planning. Heritage studies have long emphasised that ‘the past’ is actively constructed in the present, while planning theory has highlighted the future-oriented nature of planning. Yet the temporal logics that structure these practices are often treated implicitly. Drawing on sociological and historical work on social time and modern temporality, as well as critical heritage studies and planning theory, the article proposes temporal regimes as a mid-level concept for capturing patterned ways of relating past, present and future in policy and governance. The article outlines three ideal-typical temporal regimes that recur in heritage-related urban development. In a continuity regime, the past appears as a stabilising foundation for identity and place, and planning is tasked with carrying valued inheritances forward with minimal rupture. In a modernisation regime, the future is framed as qualitative improvement over a problematic past, and existing environments are treated as obstacles or raw material for redevelopment. In a sustainability/resilience regime, both past and future are organised around notions of risk, vulnerability and long-term robustness, and heritage becomes part of a broader resource base for adaptation. For each regime, the article sketches characteristic linguistic, visual and institutional expressions, and shows how they can coexist and conflict in practice. Temporal regimes thus make explicit the temporal assumptions embedded in heritage and planning and offer a conceptual bridge between empirical analyses of urban development and wider debates on the organisation of time and historicity in late modern societies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Temporal regimes in heritage and urban planning: Conceptualising the ordering of past, present and future
Date Crossref
31/07/2026
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif

Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cultural Heritage Management and PreservationMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationCultural Industries and Urban Development

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.