Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Phthalates and Alternative Plasticizers in Female Reproductive Health and Pregnancy: From Epidemiological Evidence to Nuclear Receptor-Mediated Mechanisms: A State-of-the-Art Review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Phthalate esters (PAEs), which are widely used as plasticizers in various products, are recognized as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that can affect female reproductive health. Numerous studies linked PAE exposure to several health hazards, including disruption of folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, implantation, and pregnancy maintenance, contributing to complications such as miscarriage, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. In response to growing concerns regarding their toxicity, alternative plasticizers (APs) have been introduced, with particular attention given to the commonly used compounds, including di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH), tris(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitate (TOTM), di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), and acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC). While these alternatives are often presented as safer, recent studies have suggested that these compounds can also disrupt hormonal pathways and fertility regulation mechanisms. Both PAEs and APs have been shown to interact with key nuclear receptor systems, especially with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and steroid hormone receptors. These receptors are essential regulators of ovarian function, placental development, and pregnancy maintenance. Disruption of these signaling pathways, particularly in the placenta and fetal membranes, may contribute to altered inflammatory responses, impaired endocrine regulation, and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review provides a state-of-the-art synthesis of the current literature on PAEs and APs, focusing on exposure patterns, associations with female reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes, and the identification of dysregulated biological pathways. This review emphasizes the urgent need to limit plasticizer exposure, especially among women of reproductive age, in order to preserve reproductive health and prevent associated complications.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Phthalates and Alternative Plasticizers in Female Reproductive Health and Pregnancy: From Epidemiological Evidence to Nuclear Receptor-Mediated Mechanisms: A State-of-the-Art Review
Date Crossref
29/07/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPolymer Science and PVCPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.